A few life drawing studies using ink, pencil and charcoal.
Showing posts with label artist inpiration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label artist inpiration. Show all posts
Friday, 1 February 2013
Sunday, 11 November 2012
Egon Shiele and his use of line
Meghan Quigley |
![]() |
Meghan Quigley |
![]() |
Egon Schiele |
I have been making a lot of drawings recently and framing some work that I have made previously. I love Egon Schiele, and recently I have been receiving a lot of comments that our styles are similar (which I'm very happy about!) I love the contrasting use of angular sharp and curved lines to depict the human form, as well as the controversial hyper-sexualisation.
He has long since been an inspiration for my love of linear drawings and depicting the human form!
Labels:
art,
artist,
artist inpiration,
artist research,
egon,
egon schiele,
erotic,
erotic arts,
erotica,
female,
feminism,
graphic,
lady,
meghan quigley,
nude,
pornographic,
schiele
Location:
Northern Ireland, UK
Monday, 19 December 2011
HATE: Natacha Merritt

Natacha Merrit, 'Ask me Anything,' Feb 2000
Polaroid
Digital Diaries (2001)
why YOU should hate Natacha Merritt...
One should really question the integrity and creditability of Taschen, having published Digital Girly's (Merritt's psuedonym) daily photos in Digital Dairies (2001). The only comment they have of Merrit's work is her use of the digital camera as a point of interest to denote the mark of technology in the participation of exploring identity.
I'm sure they also though highly of her assets to the medium of photography.
It is obvious that the photographer in question has no formal arts background, her work is akin to that of any number of girls posing and posting pictures on Facebook. Her unsuccessful attempts to de-construct the feminine archetypes is laughable, Merrit’s ‘celebration’ of female sexuality and the naturalness of sexual desire is easily criticised when we consider the preparation required to make the images: her models require release forms to be signed beforehand, the intimate use of the camera requires precise framing and the use of specifically chosen seductive lighting heightens the sensual atmosphere; with both Merrit and her model knowing that they will be viewed and an image will be created, genuine enjoyment or exploration of female sexuality is anticipated and becomes artificially created - under this guise they become no less directed or staged than pornography.
Praised as a ‘contemporary counterpart’[1] to Anaïs Nin[2] by capturing erotic desires and uninhibited sexuality in her self-portraits published online, Merritt explicitly exposes her sexuality and body as a commodity. One could argue that Merritt is in the forefront in the war on a sexually-charged, exaggerated hypersexuality but Merritt indulges in this explicit, exhibitionism - she's an attention whore.
And this is where my attention wanes.
I'm bored Merritt - you don't shock me, and sadly, you don't turn me on either.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Maxim Jakubowski, The eyes of the beholder, The Guardian, 6 May 2000
[2] Anais Nin is considered the founder of female pornography, writing explicit stories and diaries about female-specific sexual desires and awakenings.
[3] Wim de Jong, Hester Scheurwater, January 20th 2011, Volkskrant Magazine, translated from Dutch,
Monday, 5 December 2011

Image found here.
I found this image of Hester Scheurwater's studio and I just thought it was really interesting in that her studio reflects entirely upon her work, it is clear from this shot that Scheurwater obsessively documents/collects images - something she avidly does with her 'Daily iPhone' images.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)